Account-Level Placement Exclusions: The Centralized Blocklist Playbook for Agencies

Hook: Stop chasing placements campaign by campaign — centralize your account-level placement exclusions

Agencies managing multiple client accounts lose hours each week to fragmented placement exclusions, misapplied blocks, and brand-safety gaps. With advertising formats increasingly automated, those manual processes now cost reputation and margin. In early 2026 Google launched account-level placement exclusions, letting teams apply a single blocklist across Performance Max, Demand Gen, YouTube, and Display. This is the operational inflection point agencies have been waiting for. This playbook shows how to implement account-level placement exclusions across clients, with a reusable standardized blocklist template and a hardened inventory QA workflow.

The evolution of placement control in 2026

Late 2025 and early 2026 accelerated two trends that make centralized exclusions mission-critical: 1) platform automation (Performance Max, Demand Gen) that reduces campaign-level control, and 2) advertiser demand for stronger guardrails to protect brand safety without undermining automation. On January 15, 2026 Google announced account-level exclusions, enabling centralized blocking across all eligible campaign types. Agencies now have the technical means — and the obligation — to standardize exclusions at scale.

Google Ads introduced account-level placement exclusions across eligible campaign types, enabling a single exclusion list to apply account-wide.

Why agencies should standardize account-level exclusions now

• Scale and consistency: One centralized list avoids configuration drift across campaigns and client accounts.
• Faster onboarding: New clients inherit vetted exclusions during account setup.
• Brand safety: Centralized guardrails reduce the risk of unwanted placements on sensitive content.
• Operational efficiency: Fewer manual checks, fewer errors, lower time-to-implement.
• Auditability: A single source of truth makes compliance and client reporting straightforward.

Core components of a centralized account-level blocklist program

Successful programs combine three elements: a standardized blocklist schema, a governance process, and an inventory QA workflow integrated into ad ops. Below are the components to build in your agency.

1. Standardized blocklist schema

Define a consistent CSV/JSON schema that every account can import. Keep fields explicit and version-controlled. Minimal recommended fields:

• type (domain | app | youtube_channel | placement_url)
• identifier (example.com | com.example.app | UCxxxxx)
• reason (brand_safety | fraud | low_quality | client_request)
• risk_tier (high | medium | low)
• added_by (team_member_id)
• added_date (YYYY-MM-DD)
• review_date (YYYY-MM-DD)
• notes

Template: Standardized blocklist (CSV)

type,identifier,reason,risk_tier,added_by,added_date,review_date,notes
domain,example.com,brand_safety,high,jane.doe,2026-01-20,2026-07-20,Contains extremist content
youtube_channel,UC1234567890abcdef,fraud,high,john.smith,2026-01-18,2026-04-18,Channel uses misleading thumbnails
app,com.badapp.example,low_quality,medium,sam.agent,2026-01-19,2026-07-19,Frequent ad fraud reports
placement_url,https://sub.example.com/path,brand_safety,high,jane.doe,2026-01-20,2026-07-20,Contextual mismatch with client brand

2. Governance: approval and change control

Use a lightweight change-control process so updates are fast but auditable. Recommended workflow:

1. Propose change: ad ops or client flags a placement and submits a blocklist row.
2. Initial triage: brand safety specialist categorizes reason and risk tier.
3. Client approval: high-risk blocks require client sign-off; medium/low can auto-apply under SLA.
4. Apply: update account-level exclusions via manager account or API.
5. Audit log: all changes recorded with user, timestamp, and reason.
6. Review cadence: automatic review_date prompts re-evaluation every 3–6 months.

3. Inventory QA: pre- and post-deployment checks

Inventory QA prevents regeneration of unsafe placements and verifies blocklists are effective. Use this operational QA checklist each time a new exclusion list is deployed:

• Pre-deploy: confirm CSV schema matches expected format and no duplicate identifiers.
• Pre-deploy: simulate account-level exclusion in a sandbox or test account when available — use observability and simulation tools described in modern observability playbooks.
• Deploy: apply exclusions at the account level in Google Ads manager account (MCC) or via API.
• Post-deploy (24–72 hours): run a placement report across active campaigns to confirm zero spend on excluded placements.
• Ongoing: weekly sampling for top 1% of placements by spend and automated alerts for any excluded identifier appearing in delivery logs.
• Monthly: reconcile platform-level reports (Google Ads + third-party verification like IAS or DoubleVerify) for mismatches — treat third-party signals as you would other platform feed integrations (see modern newsroom and verification integration patterns at newsrooms built for 2026).

Inventory QA checklist
1. Validate CSV schema and integrity
2. Confirm client sign-off for high-risk items
3. Apply to account-level exclusions via MCC or API
4. Export placements report 24-72 hours post-deploy
5. Verify no delivery on excluded identifiers
6. Set automated alerts for any matches
7. Log the change and schedule review_date

Step-by-step implementation: how an agency rolls this out across clients

Below is a practical seven-step rollout you can apply today.

Step 1: Build your master blocklist and classification taxonomy

Start with a master list that consolidates client requests, industry blacklists, and third-party signals. Classify every item by risk_tier and reason so you can apply varying treatment across clients. Store the master list and taxonomy using templates-as-code and version control so rollbacks and diffs are straightforward.

Step 2: Map clients to risk profiles

Not every client needs the same blacklist. Create profiles — conservative, balanced, permissive — that map to a subset of the master list. Conservative clients get high+medium+low; permissive get high only.

Step 3: Configure your manager-account deployment method

For Google Ads, use your MCC (Manager) account or Google Ads API to push account-level exclusions. Build a single deployment script that accepts CSVs and client profiles and performs these tasks:

• Validate CSV
• Filter identifiers by client profile
• Call Google Ads API to upload exclusions
• Record success/failure in an audit log

Step 4: Client onboarding and approvals

Embed the blocklist in new-client onboarding. Include the client profile, the initial exclusions to apply, and an explicit approval step for high-risk items. For existing clients, offer a consult to select the profile and explain performance tradeoffs.

Step 5: QA and monitoring

After deployment run the Inventory QA checklist. Set automated monitoring that compares placement reports to the active exclusions and sends alerts to ad ops and account teams when mismatches occur.

Step 6: Reporting and business impact tracking

Report the following monthly KPIs to clients: number of blocked placements, spend avoided, impressions avoided, and any performance delta in CTR/CPA after exclusions. Use these metrics to justify the program and refine the blocklist.

Step 7: Continuous improvement

Hold a quarterly governance review to retire stale items, reclassify risk tiers, and update the master list using delivery data and third-party verification signals. Consider augmented oversight patterns for fast triage and batch review of dynamically flagged items.

Operational integrations and automations

To scale across dozens or hundreds of clients, automate everywhere you can:

• API-driven deployment: Use Google Ads API to programmatically upload exclusions and tie the deployment to your existing ad ops platform. Treat API integrations as part of your ops reliability playbook (see resilient ops strategies).
• Auto-scan placements: Schedule daily placement scans that match delivery logs against your blocklist and open tickets automatically.
• Third-party feeds: Integrate signals from verification vendors (e.g., IAS, DoubleVerify) to flag new domains and channels dynamically.
• Version control: Store blocklists in a central Git or asset store so you can roll back changes and produce audit reports — the same patterns used in modern templates-as-code approaches (modular publishing workflows).

Sample API deployment pseudo-flow

Below is a simplified pseudo-flow for applying exclusions using a manager account and a standardized CSV. This is abstracted to be platform-agnostic.

for each client in client_list:
  load client_profile
  filtered_list = filter(master_blocklist, client_profile)
  validate(filtered_list)
  api_response = google_ads_api.uploadAccountLevelExclusions(client.account_id, filtered_list)
  log(api_response)
  if api_response.failed:
    create_ticket(account_team, api_response.error)

Inventory QA: detailed tests and examples

Here are concrete QA queries and tests you should run after deployment.

• Placements report: Export placements by URL and compare identifiers to the applied exclusions. Expect 0 overlaps for high-risk items.
• Top placements by spend: Ensure none are on the blocklist. If they are, investigate whether the exclusion propagated or if the placement uses a redirect or alias.
• YouTube mapping: Validate that excluded channels or videos show zero or blocked impressions. YouTube placement matching can be noisy; review by channel ID rather than display name.
• App inventory: Confirm blocked app IDs are removed from all Display and YouTube app-targeted placements.
• Cross-platform check: If you run other DSPs, sync blocklists across each platform to prevent cross-channel leakage.

Real-world example: agency rollout case study

Context: A mid-sized agency managed ads for 48 brands across retail, finance, and CPG. Manual campaign-level exclusions led to inconsistent protection and client complaints about placements on low-quality publisher sites.

Action: The agency adopted an account-level blocklist program in Q1 2026. They built a master list, defined three client profiles, and pushed exclusions via their MCC with nightly reconciliation. They integrated DoubleVerify signals and automated alerts for excluded identifiers appearing in delivery logs.

Result (90 days): 85% reduction in reported unwanted placements, a 40% drop in hours spent on placement troubleshooting, and no measurable negative impact to overall CPA for critical campaigns. Clients reported improved confidence in programmatic safety and renewed contracts.

Common pitfalls and how to avoid them

• Over-blocking: Blocking too aggressively can reduce reach and inflate CPAs. Use risk tiers and client profiles to balance safety and performance.
• Poor naming conventions: Inconsistent identifiers cause false negatives. Standardize on canonical domain names, app IDs, and YouTube channel IDs.
• No audit trail: Without logs, disputes with clients are hard to resolve. Log everything and expose reports to clients — build your logging with observability best practices (observability playbook).
• Not syncing across channels: Block only in Google Ads and you may still get traffic via other DSPs. Centralize the blocklist and distribute it to all platforms.

Advanced strategies for enterprise agencies

Once you have a baseline program, evolve it with these advanced techniques:

• Dynamic blocklists: Automatically add placements flagged by verification vendors, then batch-review via governance rules (see augmented oversight).
• Contextual signals: Use semantic analysis on URLs to block categories of content instead of single domains, particularly for emerging content issues. Consider AI-driven perceptual techniques from adjacent fields (perceptual AI playbooks).
• Exception policies: Allow whitelists for vetted partners with strict contractual clauses and close monitoring.
• Experimentation guardrails: When testing new inventory, use isolated test accounts so exclusions do not accidentally apply to other clients.

Measuring program ROI

To quantify the value to clients, measure both direct and indirect impacts:

• Direct: impressions and spend avoided on excluded placements, verified bad-placement reductions from third-party vendors.
• Indirect: reduction in client escalations, time saved for ad ops, and improved brand safety scores in monthly reports.
• Performance delta: track CPA, CTR, and conversion rate before and after deployment to demonstrate minimal negative impact when properly scoped.

2026 predictions: where placement control goes next

Expect these developments through 2026 and into 2027:

• More platform-level guardrails from major ad networks to match advertiser demand for safety.
• API-first blocklist management with real-time signals from verification partners.
• Greater use of contextual and semantic classification (AI-driven) to block categories instead of static domains.
• Standardized industry schemas for blocklists so agencies can port lists across systems easily.

Checklist: Launch an account-level placement exclusion program in 30 days

1. Create master blocklist and taxonomy
2. Define client risk profiles
3. Build CSV/JSON schema and version control
4. Develop API deployment script and audit logging
5. Run pilot with 2–3 clients and complete Inventory QA
6. Scale to additional clients with defined SLAs and governance
7. Set quarterly reviews and continuous integration with verification feeds

Final takeaways and next steps

Account-level exclusions are an operational upgrade, not just a feature. When agencies centralize blocklists with a rigorous governance and QA workflow, they unlock consistency, speed, and stronger brand safety across client portfolios. Use the standardized blocklist template above, automate deployment via MCC or the API, and embed Inventory QA into your ad ops SLA.

Call to action

Ready to implement this across your client roster? Download our editable CSV template and an implementation checklist, or contact our ad ops team for a 30-minute technical audit and deployment plan tailored to your agency. Move from reactive exclusions to predictable, auditable brand protection across every account.

Related Reading

• Building a Resilient Ops Stack — automation & reliability
• Observability for workflow microservices
• Templates-as-code & version control for publishing workflows
• Augmented oversight & governance for supervised systems
• DIY Collagen-Boosting Syrups: A Mixologist’s Guide to Making Skin-Friendly Simple Syrups
• The Value Shopper’s Guide to Robot Vacuums: Where to Spend and Where to Save
• How to Tell Rich Product Stories: Curating Art-Inspired Copy for Blouse Pages
• Subscription Box vs One-Off Bulk Order: Which Way to Buy Seafood for Maximum Freshness and Value
• Build a Modest Capsule Wardrobe Before Prices Rise: 10 Investment Pieces